The Genitalia and Rectum diagnosis assessment on episodic case study

This is an assignment that focuses on the Genitalia and rectum diagnosis assessment based on the episodic case study.

The Genitalia and Rectum diagnosis assessment on episodic case study

Firstly, review th‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍e Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the attached section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study. • Based on the Episodic note case study: Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study. Refer to Chapter 3 of the Sullivan resource to guide you as you complete your Lab Assignment.

Secondly, search the school library or the Internet for evidence-based resources to support your answers to the questions provided. Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.

Thirdly, consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

Identify at least five possible conditions that you may consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

The Lab Assignment post 3 pages Using evidence-based resources from your search, answer the following questions and support your answers using current evidence from the literature.

• Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that you are to include in the documentation.

• Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.• Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?

• Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case. Also, how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

• Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that you may consider as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍based literature.

• Use 4 to 5 references less than 10 years old