civil rights

This paper should be typewritten (12-point font), double-spaced, and have one-inch margins. Please include your name, the professor’s name, and the name of your section leader on the top of the first page of the paper. (An extra title page is unnecessary.) The paper, which is worth 20% of the course grade, should be 2 pages long. Choose ONE of the following primary sources from chapter one in Major Problems in American History #2 (A Southern Songwriter), #3 (Louisiana Black Codes), or #8 (Lucy McMillan Testimony) and write your essay with the following guidelines in mind. 

After reading the source (a few times would be a good idea), you should place the source in historical context and assess its significance. Consider how the document sheds light on relevant aspects of life in the post-Civil War South. In addition to saying something about the time period in which the document was written the era of Reconstruction you should then analyze the document itself. You might say something (in general terms) about the author, about the documents purpose, and about the message it conveys. If possible, you might note the documents intended audience. In analyzing the document and explaining its historical significance, you can certainly quote directly from the source (use quotation marks to indicate a direct quotation). In two pages, you will not be able to consider every part of the document. Thus, you should write about those sections of the source that you find most interesting, important, or illuminating. The aim of your essay is to use the document to shed light on an important element of the historical period in which it was written. In short, by looking carefully at the document and discussing its language, you should explain to your reader how this particular source helps us to understand some aspect of life in the American South after the Civil War.

Note: In writing the paper, you should base your understanding of the period and the document on the two essays in chapter one of Major Problems; on the material covered in the relevant lectures; and on the discussions you have had in your sections. You do not need to do any outside reading to complete this assignment.


“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post civil rights first appeared on nursing writers.

civil rights

I’m working on a Law question and need guidance to help me study.

You must do your own work and use Turnitin. I will not accept any paper that has 25% or more

“similarity.” See Syllabus. I will also not accept papers that fail to properly cite to sources.

Like all papers you’ll submit, formatting is: 1” margins all around, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. No headers, extra spaces between paragraphs – none of the little tricks that take up space.

There is a 5 full page minimum, If you want a better score, then do more than the minimum required work. I can tell when a student has done the work and when they have waited until the last minute to throw something together.

You must answer the following three questions:

Question 1:

Interstate commerce refers to business transactions between individuals or businesses from two or more states. You’ve learned that Congress uses interstate commerce as a tool to force businesses to comply with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Go to:…

to read, in depth, a case referenced in your book: The Heart of Atlanta Motel v. The United States.

Tell me what the main arguments are for both the Plaintiff and the Defendant. Tell me how the Supreme Court ruled and why. I want to see facts and analysis in your paper that are not included in the book.

Question 2:

Private clubs are exempt from the Civil Rights Act. Go to:…

Tell me what the main arguments are for both the Plaintiff and the Defendant. Tell me how the court ruled and why.

Question 3:

Nevada Revised Statute 651.065 says “….is not unlawful and is not a ground for a civil action for any place of public accommodation to offer differential pricing, discounted pricing or special offers based on sex to promote or market the place of public accommodation.”

Under Nevada law a “place of public accommodation” includes a nightclub, which are very popular in Las Vegas.

So, basically, Nevada says it is legal to intentionally discriminate against men when it comes to charging entry fees to nightclubs. In other words, it is legally permissible for a nightclub to charge men a $40 entry fee but to allow women to enter for free. That decision is based solely on gender.

Is Nevada’s law actually legal? Does it conflict with a more superior law? If so, which one? What are your personal thoughts on this