This is a paper that is focusing on the America’s forgotten pandemic the influence of 1918 critique. The paper also provides additional information to use in writing this assignment paper well.
America’s forgotten pandemic the influence of 1918 critique
This assignment requires you to compare and contrast two books from different generations of scholarship based upon each author’s scope, method, and point of view. Then, explain if the books were good, effective pieces, or not—and why. You explain your assertions/critiques (the “why”) by citing the authors’ own work.
A) Scope: What is the range of the author’s argument- what is he/she talking about? What are they setting out to do in the essay?
B) Method: How is the author trying to make his/her case? What types of sources/evidence do they appear to be using or relying upon?
C) Point of view: What is the author ultimately saying? Are they trying to make a new case about something? Are they saying other historians, or a particular historian, have been wrong about something? Also, are they suggesting a new theoretical or methodological direction about something? Do they have a slant?
Your critique: Provide your informed opinion of the essays by noting what the authors have or have not done well and use specific examples (cited) from the essays
The two books are you’ll be comparing are:
“A Report on an Epidemic of Influenza in the City of Chicago in the Fall” of 1918 by John Robertson and America’s forgotten pandemic: the influence of 1918 by, Alfred Crosby.
Remember, ensure that the paper is at least three pages exclusive of the cover and the reference pages. Also, ensure that you include all the references you use in finding research for this assignment paper. References should be at least three for the paper. All references, citation, and writing should follow the APA formatting and styling guidelines. Finally, ensure you focus on the assignment topic in detail.